Skip to main content
Registered Patent Attorney · USPTO Reg. No. 82,181
Book an Intro Call
The SciTech & IP Law Firm PLLC · USPTO Reg. No. 82,181

You Created It. Let Us Help You Protect It.

Market-benchmarked flat-fee legal products for inventors, founders, and federal innovation. Registered patent attorney with graduate science training. Transparent scopes, a capped caseload, and senior attention on every matter.

Client feedback

Trusted by Founders, Investors, and Business Leaders.

“Professional, responsive, and incredibly knowledgeable. ... William does exceptional work, consistently goes above and beyond to advocate for clients.”

“The firm is incredibly meticulous in their approach; the advice provided is always backed by exhaustive research that goes well beyond standard patent and trademark searches. ”

“William was instrumental in shaping our IP strategy as a startup. ... His deep knowledge, clear communication, and strategic approach gave us confidence at every step.”

“William was great from start to finish. He was extremely thorough and professional ... He made the entire patent process comfortable and stress-free. Highly recommend.”

“William Furlow did an outstanding job filing my patent. ... His responsiveness, attention to detail, and calm professionalism made a complex process much easier.”

"I honestly couldn’t be happier to recommend this IP law firm and William! What started as an idea that I had put on the back burner for a while was completely reignited because of William’s encouragement."  

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

100%
Project success rate across top legal platforms
2500+
Professional hours on science and technology matters
97
Complex S&T / IP projects completed in 2025
65+
Complex S&T / IP projects completed so far in 2026
How this work gets bought

Three common ways to buy legal work.

The same matter, bought three different ways. Here is what each one actually costs you in clarity.

01
Big-firm IP

Associate-heavy. Opaque hourly billing.

Your file is staffed down. You pay for someone to learn the science. Scope and cost stay unclear until the invoice arrives.

02
Online legal templates

Fast forms. Thin technical fluency.

A template will not read a specification, an OTA, or a dual-use data-rights clause. Federal and scientific work is out of range.

03
SciTech & IP Law

Senior attention. Market-benchmarked flat-fee legal pricing.

Graduate science training. Federal and dual-use fluency. A written scope and attorney fee before work starts. Official fees at cost, listed separately.

How an engagement works.

Four steps. You know the scope and the attorney fee before any billable work begins.

1

Screen and map the matter

A 15-minute video call. Fit check only, no legal advice. We map your matter to one of the nine services, and to a catalog engagement under it — a prior art search, starter website pages, a vendor agreement review.

2

Scope, fee and engagement letter

You get what is included, what is not, the assumptions, and the attorney fee. Official fees are listed separately, at cost. Representation starts only once conflicts clear, the engagement letter is signed, and any retainer is received.

3

Intake and work

You send the technical disclosures, brand specimens, contracts or government documents listed on the product card. Drafting, search or analysis follows, including the round of substantive revisions the scope covers.

4

Delivery and next steps

Work product plus a short roadmap — file, prosecute, commercialize, or enforce — and any optional follow-on products.

A desk with patent drawings, notes and a monitor under lamplight
Free assessment · Three minutes · No obligation

Not sure which of those goals is yours?

Answer eight plain-language questions about your invention, brand, or startup. You will get one recommended flat-fee starting point, what it typically covers, and the single biggest risk to watch — before you disclose, launch, or raise.

Educational only — not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship.

Featured legal products

Flagship engagements, priced up front.

Market-benchmarked flat-fee legal pricing. Attorney fees are scoped in advance against a written deliverable. Government and third-party fees are billed separately, at cost.

Flat Fee

Patentability Search

Patent

Inventors who want a low-cost first look at patentability for a single invention.

Attorney fee
$995
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Flat Fee

Provisional Application

Patent

A streamlined provisional offering listed on the firm's website at a promotional rate.

Attorney fee
From $1,750
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Tiered Fee

Trademark Application

Trademark

Streamlined trademark filings listed on the firm's website; tier chosen by mark/goods complexity and the level of attorney support.

Attorney fee
From $500
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Flat Fee

Starter Website Pages

Early-Stage & Commercial Contracts

A lightweight version of the Website Legal Pages for pre-revenue or pre-launch sites.

Attorney fee
$1,700
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Flat Fee

Vendor Agreement Review

Early-Stage & Commercial Contracts

A focused attorney review of one vendor agreement with an issues memo and short markup.

Attorney fee
$1,750
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Flat Fee

Software / API Agreement Review

Tech Transactions

A focused attorney review of a vendor- or counterparty-supplied software or API agreement without active negotiation.

Attorney fee
$1,200
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Subscription

Fractional GC / IP Officer

Fractional General Counsel / IP Officer

A streamlined fractional GC / IP officer subscription.

Attorney fee
$1,800/mo +
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service
Flat Fee

Cease & Desist

Disputes, Enforcement & Pre-Litigation

A streamlined cease-and-desist letter for a narrow scope (e.g., obvious copy/paste copyright infringement or single-mark unauthorized use).

Attorney fee
From $850
USPTO / USCO / WIPO fees billed separately at cost.
View scopePay for this service

Final fee confirmed in the engagement letter. Figures on this page are illustrative. Flat fees may be split into milestones where the engagement letter allows.

See every legal product
What you actually receive

Written work product. Scoped before we start.

A prior-art search and written patentability opinion

Not a verbal hunch. A written opinion you can put in front of an investor, a board, or a co-founder.

A provisional or non-provisional draft ready for USPTO filing

The application itself, plus the filing plan that says what happens next and when.

A website legal set or a marked-up vendor agreement

Terms of Use and a Privacy Notice, or a redlined agreement with an issues memo explaining what to push back on.

See every legal product

Why SciTech & IP Law.

Large firms staff IP work down to associates who learn your science on your invoice. This firm is built the other way round.

Law and lab in one head

A J.D. plus an M.S. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from Georgetown — so the science does not have to be translated before the legal work can start.

The attorney on the call writes the claims

No handoff to an associate after the pitch. The caseload is capped on purpose so senior attention is actually available.

Federal and dual-use fluency

DoD, DOE, HHS and DHS work, CRADAs, SBIR/STTR, export control, and Stevenson-Wydler — instruments that do not standardize cleanly.

Market-benchmarked flat-fee legal pricing

Attorney fees set against a defined deliverable and checked against public competitor ranges and official USPTO, Copyright Office and WIPO fees. Official fees billed separately, at cost.

Don't just own your idea. Own the rights to it.

William Furlow, Esq., M.S., Managing Attorney
USPTO Registered Patent Attorney
Reg. No. 82,181
Bar Admissions
District of Columbia & Illinois
Graduate Science Training
M.S. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Georgetown
ABA Science and Technology Law Section
Regular contributor and presenter
United States Patent and Trademark OfficeAmerican Bar Association Science and Technology Law Section
Client results

What clients say after the work is done.

William is great and communicates effectively. William helped us ensure our product wasn't legally infringing on any similar products. Will certainly do work with again in the near future.

Sean Duckworth, Founder and Owner
SunnyGo Water Solution, Las Vegas, NV
Prior art and patentability opinion, trademark preparation and filing

William does exceptional work, from research, verification to execution. Everything was accomplished on time with urgency and care. I look forward to working with William in the future.

Loan Nguyen, Founder
ParkClear Street Parking Mobile App, Los Angeles, CA
Prior art and patentability opinion

William was very meticulous when drafting the patent application. He was patient and made sure he understood my idea fully. He also provided guidance for future steps after filing the provisional patent application.

Jorge Normandia, Founder and Owner
Technology startup, Puerto Rico
Prior art search, provisional patent drafting and filing

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Read more client results

Common questions

Read the full FAQ

Find out whether the idea is protectable before you disclose it.

Most patent rights are lost by talking about the invention too early. A 15-minute screening call is usually enough to tell you where you stand.